![dragthing app for mac ox x dragthing app for mac ox x](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-GBlAOhDI2KA/UH34YHBBksI/AAAAAAAAADs/0tljY2-XZuI/s1600/DragThing.png)
- #Dragthing app for mac ox x mac os x
- #Dragthing app for mac ox x upgrade
- #Dragthing app for mac ox x windows
Adding a "bring all to front" menu is just a band-aid to hide a mistake that didn't need to be there in the first place. It's not as if Aqua provides a global menu for accessing all open windows, like Windows's Taskbar that would be far too consistent and sensible. When one document is at the forefront, all the others that belong to that app should come with it.
![dragthing app for mac ox x dragthing app for mac ox x](https://www.topbestalternatives.com/wp-content/screenshots/dragthing-27036-3.jpg)
Users associate applications with tasks the documents in an open app are part of that association. This feature is, I think, a fundamentally flawed bit of UI design. But if you then click on one of those documents, you will get just that single window the remaining documents remain in the back somewhere. All those documents will recede into the background. Let's say you open multiple documents in a given app, then go off and do something else for a while. Under OS X, each document window is its own layer.
#Dragthing app for mac ox x windows
In OS 9, an app's windows are clustered together: When you bring one document window to the foreground, all the other document windows for that application come with it. Some of its new interface behaviors hurt my brain. Same for text editing wasted pixels means less text is visible at one time, which means I spend a lot more time scrolling around a document than I should have to.īut Aqua isn't just big and fuzzy. If I'm working on an Excel spreadsheet under OS X, a larger UI means I can fit fewer cells onscreen. Judging from my recent experiences with iBooks and the generally spiffy 800MHz iMac I'm currently running through its paces (more on that in a future column), Aqua looks better on LCDs than on a CRT.īIGGER IS PROBABLY not better in this case.
#Dragthing app for mac ox x upgrade
Call me a cynic, but I have a nagging suspicion that someone at Apple thinks this extravagant use of screen real estate is an excellent way to get us all to upgrade to larger LCD displays.
#Dragthing app for mac ox x mac os x
My (admittedly) subjective impression is that, in terms of how much useful information I can fit on the screen, 1024x768 under Mac OS X is the functional equivalent to 800圆00 under Mac OS 9. I'm greedy with my pixels and don't like it when Aqua absconds with them. The gratuitous shadows around windows eat up screen real estate that I would rather keep to myself. The abundant anti-aliasing is just one of the many problems I have with the Aqua interface. But prolonged exposure to Mac OS X-particularly its anti-aliased text-really peeves my eyeballs. I have uncorrected vision, and I'd like to keep it that way as long as possible.
![dragthing app for mac ox x dragthing app for mac ox x](https://arcadesite169.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/6/3/126393531/357189608.png)
But there are two things I miss dearly whenever I'm in X: visual clarity and interface sanity.Ĭompared with Mac OS 9, running under OS X feels like someone smeared Vaseline all over my monitor. This state of affairs snuck up on me, but makes plenty of sense in hindsight: I can do a lot of nifty and useful stuff under Mac OS X that I couldn't do under Mac OS 9. COMMENTARY- As those of you who tuned in last time will remember, I recently discovered that I was spending more time running Mac OS X than Mac OS 9.